Re: display hot standby state in psql prompt
| От | Jim Jones |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: display hot standby state in psql prompt |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 69fe434e-d7b0-42f1-9368-cc76de7f446f@uni-muenster.de обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: display hot standby state in psql prompt (Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: display hot standby state in psql prompt
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 10/11/2025 08:30, Fujii Masao wrote: > If the main goal of this feature is to help users easily determine > whether they're connected to a primary or a standby, > seems simply showing whether the server is in hot standby > should be sufficient. I'm not sure how useful it would be in practice > to show information based on default_transaction_read_only or > transaction_read_only. This "primary" or "standby" approach was actually the initial proposal, but it evolved after a few reviews. Extending it to use transaction_read_only and default_transaction_read_only adds real value to the feature, but doing so requires either: 1. Marking transaction_read_only as GUC_REPORT (controversial and rejected in the past), or 2. Querying transaction_read_only with SHOW every time the prompt is displayed within a transaction block (IMO minimal overhead -- but unconventional?). Although I lean toward the initial proposal, I can totally live with either approach, since both would be able to distinguish if a server is in hot standby or not. Should we switch back to the initial proposal? Thanks! Best, Jim
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: