> On 26 Jun 2025, at 20:01, Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se> wrote:
>
>> On 26 Jun 2025, at 15:33, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>
>> So on the whole I prefer the "void" approach. I'm not dead
>> set on that though, it's just a niggling worry.
>
> I think the likelyhood of it being a problem in practice is pretty slim, but
> it's still a stronger argument than my "match an API we're still not aligned
> with". The attached v7 reverts back to void return.
In preparing for concluding this I've attached a v8 which is the patchset in v7
squashed into a single commit with an attempt at a commit message.
This version has been tested against v17 and v16 where it applies and passes
all tests (the latter isn't as assuring as it should be since there is a lack
of testcoverage).
--
Daniel Gustafsson