On Aug 23, 2004, at 3:59 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
>> But is it possible to store non-UTF-8 data in a UNICODE database?
>
> In theory not ... but I think there was a discussion earlier that
> concluded that our check for encoding validity is not airtight ...
Well, it it was mostly right, I wouldn't expect it to be a problem as
much as this issue is coming up for me. If, OTOH, the encoding validity
check leaks like a sieve, then I might indeed have a bigger problem.
Is the encoding check fixed in 8.0beta1?
Thanks,
David