Re: Proposal for Signal Detection Refactoring

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: Proposal for Signal Detection Refactoring
Дата
Msg-id 6982.1537839491@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Proposal for Signal Detection Refactoring  (Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>)
Ответы Re: Proposal for Signal Detection Refactoring  (Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> writes:
> At the same time, all the pending flags in miscadmin.h could be switched
> to sig_atomic_t if we were to be correct, no?  The counters could be
> higher than 256 so that's not really possible. 

Yeah, in principle any global variable touched by a signal handler should
be sig_atomic_t.  I don't know of any modern platform where using "bool"
is unsafe, but per the C standard it could be.  The case that would be
worrisome is if setting the variable requires a load/modify/store, which
does apply to char-sized variables on some ancient platforms.  I think
there's no need to worry for int-sized variables.

            regards, tom lane


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Michael Paquier
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Proposal for Signal Detection Refactoring
Следующее
От: "Tsunakawa, Takayuki"
Дата:
Сообщение: RE: Changing the setting of wal_sender_timeout per standby