Re: Hot Standby on git

Simon Riggs <simon@2ndQuadrant.com> writes:
> I don't see how that helps at all. The objective of lock counters was to
> know if we can skip acquiring an LWlock on all lock partitions. This
> change keeps the lock counters yet acquires the locks we were trying to
> avoid. This change needs some justification since it is not a bug fix.

[ scratches head ... ]  Why is hot standby messing with this sort of
thing at all?  It sounds like a performance optimization that should
be considered separately, and *later*.
        regards, tom lane