Re: timeout implementation issues

Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> I have added this to the TODO list, with a question mark.  Hope this is
> OK with everyone.

>         o Abort SET changes made in aborted transactions (?)

Actually, I was planning to make only search_path act that way, because
of all the push-back I'd gotten on applying it to other SET variables.
search_path really *has* to have it, but if there's anyone who agrees
with me about doing it for all SET vars, they didn't speak up :-(
        regards, tom lane