Re: Heads Up: cirrus-ci is shutting down June 1st
| От | David E. Wheeler |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Heads Up: cirrus-ci is shutting down June 1st |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 6917DA20-3050-4E6F-9AEF-D66AC4F89999@justatheory.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Heads Up: cirrus-ci is shutting down June 1st (Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka@iki.fi>) |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Hi, I’ve started thinking about moving away from GitHub actions myself, and was wondering what else was out there that fulfillsa bunch of these needs. Feedback I got and some brief research turned up Woodpecker CI[0] [0]: https://woodpecker-ci.org/ On Apr 13, 2026, at 04:34, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka@iki.fi> wrote: > These probably go together. > > I think it's important that you can self-host. Even with cirrus-ci I actually wished there was an easy way to run the jobslocally. I don't know how often I'd really do it, but especially developing and testing the ci yaml files is painfulwhen you can't run it locally. While Woodpecker promotes its Docker images, esp. for integration with Codeberg and other Forgejo services, it’s a Go appso compiles for quite a lot of platforms, and has a “local mode” in which, from what I understand, you can run it on whatevertrusted hardware you’d like. So if we have, say, a Mac Mini plus an arm and amd system capable of virtualizing Linux, BSD, etc., perhaps we’d be ableto get the coverage we need and host the results in a self-hosted Woodpecker service? As I say, I’ve just started to kind of cast about for alternatives, so don’t know a lot about it myself, but on the surfaceit looks promising. Best, David
Вложения
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: