Re: 500x speed-down: Wrong query plan?
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: 500x speed-down: Wrong query plan? |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 6914.1136833010@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: 500x speed-down: Wrong query plan? (Alessandro Baretta <a.baretta@barettadeit.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: 500x speed-down: Wrong statistics!
|
| Список | pgsql-performance |
Alessandro Baretta <a.baretta@barettadeit.com> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> I'm curious to see how many rows the planner thinks this will produce,
>> and whether it will use the index or not.
> dmd-freerp-1-alex=# EXPLAIN ANALYZE SELECT * FROM articolo WHERE
> articolo.xdbs_modified > '2006-01-08 18:25:00+01';
> QUERY PLAN
>
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Index Scan using articolo_modified_index on articolo (cost=0.00..3914.91
> rows=17697 width=653) (actual time=0.032..0.032 rows=0 loops=1)
> Index Cond: (xdbs_modified > '2006-01-08 18:25:00'::timestamp without time zone)
> Total runtime: 0.150 ms
> (3 rows)
Well, there's your problem: 17697 rows estimated vs 0 actual. With a
closer row estimate it would've probably done the right thing for the
join problem.
How many rows are really in the table, anyway? Could we see the
pg_stats row for articolo.xdbs_modified?
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: