--On Donnerstag, März 09, 2006 17:23:11 -0500 Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
wrote:
> (BTW, there was some work being done on updatable views, but I think
> it's stalled. I suspect the reason is that our current rule system
> is just too odd to support updatable views reasonably. I've been
> wondering if an implementation based on allowing triggers on views
> would be any more manageable.)
It has stalled because I want more than SQL92 to be implemented...but
that's another story. I've sent my latest patches against HEAD to -hackers
for discussion.
Bernd