Re: Remove vacuum_defer_cleanup_age

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Josh Berkus
Тема Re: Remove vacuum_defer_cleanup_age
Дата
Msg-id 6907f5e0-19de-2aac-ac70-68a56ae781f4@agliodbs.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Remove vacuum_defer_cleanup_age  (Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>)
Ответы Re: Remove vacuum_defer_cleanup_age  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On 10/12/2016 05:00 PM, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 9, 2016 at 9:51 PM, Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com> wrote:
>> Given that hot_standby_feedback is pretty bulletproof now, and a lot of
>> the work in reducing replay conflicts, I think the utility of
>> vacuum_defer_cleanup_age is at an end.  I really meant so submit a patch
>> to remove it to 9.6, but it got away from me.
>>
>> Any objections to removing the option in 10?
> 
> I'm not sure I see the point.

Redusing the number of configuration variables is an a-priori good.  In
aggregate, the more knobs we have, the harder it is to learn how to
admin Postgres.  Therefore any time a config variable becomes obsolete,
we should remove it.

-- 
--
Josh Berkus
Red Hat OSAS
(any opinions are my own)



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Claudio Freire
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Indirect indexes
Следующее
От: Robert Haas
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: PATCH: two slab-like memory allocators