Re: GNU/Hurd portability patches
От | Michael Banck |
---|---|
Тема | Re: GNU/Hurd portability patches |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 68643ea2.050a0220.128f53.3f77@mx.google.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: GNU/Hurd portability patches (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: GNU/Hurd portability patches
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Hi, On Tue, Jul 01, 2025 at 12:41:50PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > Michael Banck <mbanck@gmx.net> writes: > > please find attached the current patches required to get master built > > and the testsuites run on Debian's hurd-i386 port. I have not had the > > time to test the hurd-amd64 port in the same fashion, but will do so > > next. > > Pushed, after some fooling with the comments and commit messages. Thanks! Also for back-patching them. Regarding the comment, | * If <limits.h> didn't define IOV_MAX, define our own. X/Open requires at | * least 16. (GNU Hurd apparently feel that they're not bound by X/Open, | * because they don't define this symbol at all.) I personally don't care much about those missing limits on the Hurd, but Thomas mentioned in CA+hUKG+tqFVY7Fi=WBvZ6-UsATjcPNBDtphDm7YLjevm2kxSvw@mail.gmail.com (and Samuel Thibault cited the same sentence to me now when I discussed the commit with him) that POSIX said "A definition of one of the symbolic constants in the following list shall be omitted from <limits.h> on specific implementations where the corresponding value is equal to or greater than the stated minimum, but is unspecified". So "requires at least 16" might be a bit too strong here, AIUI. > Please go ahead and set up a Hurd buildfarm member, so that it > stays fixed. Right, will look into this next. Michael
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: