Re: snprintf causes regression tests to fail

Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> Does it help if you flip the order of the snprintf and vsnprintf
>> functions in snprintf.c?

> Yes, it fixes the problem and I have applied the reordering with a
> comment.

Fascinating.

> I will start working on fixing the large fmtpar allocations now.

Quite honestly, this code is not worth micro-optimizing because it
is fundamentally broken.  See my other comments in this thread.

Can we find a BSD-license implementation that follows the spec?

            regards, tom lane