Re: Safeguards against incorrect fd flags for fsync()
| От | Michael Banck |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Safeguards against incorrect fd flags for fsync() |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 685b918c.050a0220.164a50.04e1@mx.google.com обсуждение |
| Ответ на | Re: Safeguards against incorrect fd flags for fsync() (Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>) |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Hi, On Wed, Jun 25, 2025 at 08:36:01AM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote: > On Tue, Jun 24, 2025 at 07:51:08AM +0200, Michael Banck wrote: > > I got it working, I had to rebuild gnumach with --enable-apic in order > > to get HPET. With that, the regular build-farm checks (check/ > > installcheck in contrib, src/test/regress and src/test/isolation) pass > > without patches to testsuite timings. > > How many custom patches did you have to apply to the backend to make > these suites work on this platform? Just those two (i.e. the one I posted in this thread and one adopted from the current Debian package and discussed in [1]): https://github.com/postgres/postgres/compare/master...mbanck:postgres:hurd-port I am going to post them again for the next commitfest. Michael [1] https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/6846e0c3.df0a0220.39ef9b.c60e%40mx.google.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: