Re: plpython function problem workaround

Michael Fuhr <mike@fuhr.org> writes:
> On Fri, Mar 18, 2005 at 12:35:07AM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
>> So that part of it can be solved fairly easily.

> Should I submit a patch?  It should be only a few additional lines
> in PLy_procedure_munge_source().  Would you apply it only to HEAD,
> or would it be considered a bug fix that REL8_0_STABLE could get
> as well?  It might be nice to have it in 8.0.2, whenever that comes
> out.

I think it would be reasonable to back-patch a small fix to convert CRLF.
The sort of rewrite Marco is considering, I wouldn't back-patch.

            regards, tom lane