Re: A renewed plea for inclusion of zone.tab

On Apr 10, 2009, at 12:15 PM, Tom Lane wrote:

> I gave my reasoning before: widening this API has possibly nontrivial
> future maintenance costs, and the actual use-case for the data is
> unconvincing.

It seems to me that the immediate patch to simply copy zone.tab has no  
effect on the API. That's a debate worth having, but I don't think  
it's relevant to this particular patch, is it?

Best,

David