Re: [HACKERS] Varying results when using merge joins over postgres_fdw vs hash joins

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: [HACKERS] Varying results when using merge joins over postgres_fdw vs hash joins
Дата
Msg-id 6805.1505924882@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [HACKERS] Varying results when using merge joins overpostgres_fdw vs hash joins  (Corey Huinker <corey.huinker@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: [HACKERS] Varying results when using merge joins overpostgres_fdw vs hash joins  (David Kohn <david.kohn@moat.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Corey Huinker <corey.huinker@gmail.com> writes:
> We had difficulty finding the place in the code were LC_COLLATE gets
> recombobulated into a recognized collation.

That's because it isn't.  The DB's default collation boils down to
"call strcoll(), having set LC_COLLATE to whatever pg_database says".
Non-default collations go through strcoll_l(), which might not even
exist on a given platform.  So they're entirely separate code paths.
        regards, tom lane


-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Peter Geoghegan
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] Varying results when using merge joins overpostgres_fdw vs hash joins
Следующее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] Varying results when using merge joins over postgres_fdw vs hash joins