Re: [HACKERS] createlang/droplang deprecated
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: [HACKERS] createlang/droplang deprecated |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 680.1489850956@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение |
| Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] createlang/droplang deprecated (Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>) |
| Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] createlang/droplang deprecated
Re: [HACKERS] createlang/droplang deprecated |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> writes:
>> 2017-03-18 14:00 GMT+01:00 Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>:
>>> I just noticed that createlang and droplang have been listed as
>>> deprecated since PG 9.1.
>>> Do we dare remove them?
> (I'd extend it to all the non-prefixed pg binaries, but let's open that can
> of worms right now, one thing at a time)
To my mind, these two and createuser/dropuser are the only really serious
namespacing problems among our standard binaries. The ones with names
ending in "db" don't seem likely to cause huge confusion. I suppose that
if we were naming it today, "psql" wouldn't get that name; but the chances
of renaming that one are certainly zero, namespace conflict or no.
But createuser/dropuser are a real problem, because they certainly could
be mistaken for system-level utilities.
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: