On 16/01/2024 11:58 pm, Jim Nasby wrote:
> On 1/16/24 2:10 PM, Konstantin Knizhnik wrote:
>> Amazon RDS is just vanilla Postgres with file system mounted on EBS
>> (Amazon distributed file system).
>> EBS provides good throughput but larger latencies comparing with
>> local SSDs.
>> I am not sure if read-ahead works for EBS.
>
> Actually, EBS only provides a block device - it's definitely not a
> filesystem itself (*EFS* is a filesystem - but it's also significantly
> different than EBS). So as long as readahead is happening somewheer
> above the block device I would expect it to JustWork on EBS.
Thank you for clarification.
Yes, EBS is just block device and read-ahead can be used fir it as for
any other local device.
There is actually recommendation to increase read-ahead for EBS device
to reach better performance on some workloads:
https://docs.aws.amazon.com/AWSEC2/latest/UserGuide/EBSPerformance.html
So looks like for sequential access pattern manual prefetching at EBS is
not needed.
But at Neon situation is quite different. May be Aurora Postgres is
using some other mechanism for speed-up vacuum and seqscan,
but Neon is using Postgres prefetch mechanism for it.