Re: Multi tenancy : schema vs databases

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От John R Pierce
Тема Re: Multi tenancy : schema vs databases
Дата
Msg-id 67e17198-f4af-aae8-1022-69a04b176d28@hogranch.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Multi tenancy : schema vs databases  (Rakesh Kumar <rakeshkumar464@outlook.com>)
Ответы Re: Multi tenancy : schema vs databases  (Rakesh Kumar <rakeshkumar464@outlook.com>)
Re: Multi tenancy : schema vs databases  (Vick Khera <vivek@khera.org>)
Список pgsql-general
On 9/30/2016 2:06 AM, Rakesh Kumar wrote:
> We require complete data isolation. Absolutely nothing should be shared between two tenants.
>
> WHy would multiple dbs be any worse than multiple schemas in performance?

complete?  use 1000s of seperate VM instances, one per tennant.


ok, thats ridiculous, isn't it.   so now its time to find a compromise.



--
john r pierce, recycling bits in santa cruz



В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Rakesh Kumar
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Multi tenancy : schema vs databases
Следующее
От: Thomas Kellerer
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: pg_upgrade from 9.5 to 9.6 fails with "invalid argument"