Re: why there is not VACUUM FULL CONCURRENTLY?
От | Michael Banck |
---|---|
Тема | Re: why there is not VACUUM FULL CONCURRENTLY? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 679b3979.5d0a0220.115578.3e08@mx.google.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | why there is not VACUUM FULL CONCURRENTLY? (Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Hi, On Mon, Jan 13, 2025 at 02:48:31PM +0100, Antonin Houska wrote: > Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org> wrote: > > On 2025-Jan-09, Antonin Houska wrote: > > > It seems you accidentally fixed another problem :-) I was referring to the > > > 'lockmode' argument of make_new_heap(). I can try to write a patch for that > > > but ... > > > > > > > Meanwhile the patch 0004 has some seemingly trivial conflicts. If you > > > > want to rebase, I'd appreciate that. In the meantime I'll give a look > > > > at the next two other API changes. > > This is the patch series rebased on top of the commit cc811f92ba. > > I haven't addressed the problem of a new command yet - for that I'd like to > see some sort of consensus, so that I do not have to do all the related > changes many times. Well, looks like this patch-set is blocked on the bikeshedding part? Somebody should call a shot here, then. Michael
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: