Re: Performance issues during pg_restore -j with big partitioned table
От | Dimitrios Apostolou |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Performance issues during pg_restore -j with big partitioned table |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 67469c1c-38bc-7d94-918a-67033f5dd731@gmx.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Performance issues during pg_restore -j with big partitioned table (Dimitrios Apostolou <jimis@gmx.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: Performance issues during pg_restore -j with big partitioned table
|
Список | pgsql-general |
On Wed, 2 Apr 2025, Dimitrios Apostolou wrote: > Hello list. > > My database includes one table with 1000 partitions, all of them rather I was not clear here: my database dump has all that, and the database is brand new and empty. > sizeable. I run: > > pg_restore -j12 --no-tablespaces --disable-triggers --exit-on-error > --no-owner --no-privileges -n public -d newdb custom_format_dump.pgdump > > Right now after 24h of restore, I notice weird behaviour, so I have several > questions about it: > > + 11 postgres backend processes are sleeping as "TRUNCATE TABLE waiting". > I see that they are waiting to issue a TRUNCATE for one of the > partitions and then COPY data to it. Checking the log I see that > several partitions have already been copied finished, but many more > are left to start. > > Why is a TRUNCATE needed at the start of a partition's COPY phase? I > didn't issue a --clean on the command line (I don't need it as my > database is newly created), and I don't see a mention of related > TRUNCATE in the pg_restore manual. > > + 1 postgres backend process is doing: > > ALTER TABLE the_master_partitioned_table > ADD CONSTRAINT ... > FOREIGN KEY (columnX) REFERENCES another_table(columnX) > > According to my logs this started right after COPY DATA for > another_table was finished. And apparently it has a lock on > the_master_partitioned_table that all other TRUNCATE have to wait for. > > Is this a bug in the dependency resolution? Wouldn't it make sense for > this to wait until all 1000 partitions have finished their COPY DATA > phase? Trying again, pg_restore exited with error after almost 24h: pg_restore: while PROCESSING TOC: pg_restore: from TOC entry 8904; 2606 16529 CONSTRAINT test_runs_raw test_runs_raw_partitioned_pkey pg_restore: error: could not execute query: ERROR: deadlock detected DETAIL: Process 465409 waits for AccessExclusiveLock on relation 44437 of database 44090; blocked by process 465408. Process 465408 waits for AccessShareLock on relation 44383 of database 44090; blocked by process 465409. HINT: See server log for query details. From the logs I see that: + Process 465409 waits for AccessExclusiveLock on relation 44437 of database 44090; blocked by process 465408. --> 44437 is test_runs_raw__part_max10120k (a single partition) + Process 465408 waits for AccessShareLock on relation 44383 of database 44090; blocked by process 465409. --> 44383 is test_runs_raw (the master partitioned table) Process 465409: ALTER TABLE ONLY public.test_runs_raw ADD CONSTRAINT test_runs_raw_partitioned_pkey PRIMARY KEY (workitem_n, run_n); Process 465408: COPY public.test_runs_raw__part_max10120k(...) FROM stdin; Bug? This happened on a postgres compiled from last week's master branch. The dump I'm trying to restore is from postgres 17.4. Thanks Dimitris
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: