Re: Do we still need constraint_exclusion?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: Do we still need constraint_exclusion?
Дата
Msg-id 6731.1231368361@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Do we still need constraint_exclusion?  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
Ответы Re: Do we still need constraint_exclusion?  (Simon Riggs <simon@2ndQuadrant.com>)
Re: Do we still need constraint_exclusion?  ("Jaime Casanova" <jcasanov@systemguards.com.ec>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes:
>> * Simon Riggs (simon@2ndQuadrant.com) wrote:
>>> I don't really understand this. Who can set up an inherited table
>>> structure but can't remember to turn on constraint_exclusion?

> This new change also adds the constraint exclusion overhead only for
> inhertance (by default) so it should slightly improve query peformance.

Right, I think that's the real winning argument for having this: it
gets the benefit of c_e for partitioned tables without imposing overhead
for non-partitioned tables.  See Josh B's remarks upthread about
actually going to the trouble of turning c_e off and on on-the-fly to
try to approximate that result.
        regards, tom lane


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Greg Smith
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Do we still need constraint_exclusion?
Следующее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Significant oversight in that #include-removal script