Re: pg_controldata gobbledygook
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: pg_controldata gobbledygook |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 672.1366950894@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение |
| Ответ на | Re: pg_controldata gobbledygook (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: pg_controldata gobbledygook
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> I think I've heard of scripts grepping the output of pg_controldata for
>> this that or the other. Any rewording of the labels would break that.
>> While I'm not opposed to improving the labels, I would vote against your
>> second, abbreviated scheme because it would make things ambiguous for
>> simple grep-based scripts.
> We could provide two alternative outputs, one for human consumption with
> the proposed format and something else that uses, say, shell assignment
> syntax. (I did propose this years ago and I might have an unfinished
> patch still lingering about somewhere.)
And a script would use that how? "pg_controldata --machine-friendly"
would fail outright on older versions. I think it's okay to ask script
writers to writepg_controldata | grep -e 'old label|new label'
but not okay to ask them to deal with anything as complicated as trying
a switch to see if it works or not.
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: