Re: pg_basebackup check vs Windows file path limits

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Daniel Gustafsson
Тема Re: pg_basebackup check vs Windows file path limits
Дата
Msg-id 67093EFC-3800-48B0-9E20-82A37A5F2A7B@yesql.se
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: pg_basebackup check vs Windows file path limits  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>)
Ответы Re: pg_basebackup check vs Windows file path limits  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>)
Список pgsql-hackers
> On 4 Jul 2023, at 20:19, Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> wrote:

> But sadly we're kinda back where we started. fairywren is failing on REL_16_STABLE. Before the changes the failure
occurredbecause the test script was unable to create the file with a path > 255. Now that we have a way to create the
filethe test for pg_basebackup to reject files with names > 100 fails, I presume because the server can't actually see
thefile. At this stage I'm thinking the best thing would be to skip the test altogether on windows if the path is
longerthan 255. 

That does sound like a fairly large hammer for a nail small enough that we
should be able to fix it, but I don't have any other good ideas off the cuff.

--
Daniel Gustafsson




В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Melih Mutlu
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [PATCH] Reuse Workers and Replication Slots during Logical Replication
Следующее
От: Bruce Momjian
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: PG 16 draft release notes ready