Re: [bug fix or improvement?] Correctly place DLLs for ECPG apps in bin folder
| От | MauMau |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: [bug fix or improvement?] Correctly place DLLs for ECPG apps in bin folder |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 6694AB3A399D4ED9B91440C4A364769A@maumau обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: [bug fix or improvement?] Correctly place DLLs for ECPG apps in bin folder (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: [bug fix or improvement?] Correctly place DLLs for
ECPG apps in bin folder
Re: [bug fix or improvement?] Correctly place DLLs for ECPG apps in bin folder |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
From: "Alvaro Herrera" <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>
> I think the suggestion by Peter Eisentraut upthread was pretty
> reasonable -- the Makefiles are already aware that they are building a
> shared library, so scrape the info off them. The less hardcoded stuff
> in the msvc framework, the better.
I overlooked his mail. Do you mean something like this? (I don't know yet
how to express this in Perl)
for each Makefile in under top_dir_in_source_tree or src/interfaces
{ if (Makefile contains SO_MAJOR_VERSION) { extract NAME value from Makefile move lib/lib${NAME}.dll to bin/ }
}
But the source tree contains as many as 206 Makefiles. I'm worried that it
will waste the install time. Should all these Makefiles be examined, or 16
Makefiles in src/interfaces/?
Regards
MauMau
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: