Re: pg_dump with both --serializable-deferrable and -j

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: pg_dump with both --serializable-deferrable and -j
Дата
Msg-id 6620.1422547809@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: pg_dump with both --serializable-deferrable and -j  (Kevin Grittner <kgrittn@ymail.com>)
Ответы Re: pg_dump with both --serializable-deferrable and -j  (Kevin Grittner <kgrittn@ymail.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Kevin Grittner <kgrittn@ymail.com> writes:
> I propose to apply the attached to master and back-patch to 9.3, 
> and follow that with a patch (for master only) along the lines 
> suggested by Andres.  Since *that* change is more invasive and 
> changes existing behavior I will submit it to the open CF for 
> review.  Objections?

Only the nit-picky one that I quite dislike putting a comment block inside
an if-condition like that.  It's not really house style around here,
and in particular I suspect pgindent might not treat it nicely.
        regards, tom lane



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Heikki Linnakangas
Дата:
Сообщение: Memory leak in gingetbitmap
Следующее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Memory leak in gingetbitmap