Re: Did we really want to force an initdb in beta2?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: Did we really want to force an initdb in beta2?
Дата
Msg-id 6618.1275584449@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Did we really want to force an initdb in beta2?  (Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com>)
Ответы Re: Did we really want to force an initdb in beta2?  (Florian Pflug <fgp@phlo.org>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com> writes:
> On 03/06/10 19:16, Tom Lane wrote:
>> What exactly was the reason for this patch?  Could it be held over till
>> 9.1?

> Before the patch, when you shut down a standby server, you get this 
> message in the log on the next startup:

> LOG:  database system was interrupted while in recovery at log time 
> 2010-06-02 14:48:28 EEST
> HINT:  If this has occurred more than once some data might be corrupted 
> and you might need to choose an earlier recovery target.
> The problem is that that hint is pretty alarming.

Maybe we should just get rid of the hint.
        regards, tom lane


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Keepalive for max_standby_delay
Следующее
От: Simon Riggs
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Keepalive for max_standby_delay