Re: Pg and Stunnel

"Roderick A. Anderson" <raanders@acm.org> writes:
> On Thu, 10 Apr 2003, Dennis Gearon wrote:
>> You  might try 5433/4

> Yeah this makes sense but I wanted to see what others might be using.  The
> tutorial from the Pg (or friend) site uses 5430 which is already assigned.

The 5433/4 numbers could get assigned at any minute, too.  That doesn't
mean they'd suddenly be likely to be in use on your site, though.  Most
of the protocols with recently-assigned numbers are pretty dang obscure.

Still, I'd lean to using one of the port numbers above 49k.  If you have
a conflict, at least no one can accuse you of ignoring published specs.

            regards, tom lane