Re: Suggested "easy" TODO: pg_dump --from-list
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Suggested "easy" TODO: pg_dump --from-list |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 6606.1290579343@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение |
| Ответ на | Re: Suggested "easy" TODO: pg_dump --from-list (Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Suggested "easy" TODO: pg_dump --from-list
Re: Suggested "easy" TODO: pg_dump --from-list |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com> writes:
>> Well, very little about pg_dump is very [E], IMNSHO. The question in my
>> mind here is what format the list file will take
> I was thinking same format as pg_restore -l, only without the dumpIDs.
Nope ... those strings are just helpful comments, they aren't really
guaranteed to be unique identifiers. In any case, it seems unlikely
that a user could expect to get the more complicated cases exactly right
other than by consulting "pg_dump | pg_restore -l" output. Which makes
the use-case kind of dubious to me.
I don't say that this wouldn't be a useful feature, but you need a
better spec than this.
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: