> On 18 Mar 2025, at 23:21, Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I actually think you could do the test with one injection point and
> just wait on it twice
I was not sure we can safely wake up on injection point and stop and the same point on next iteration.
But, apparently, it is safe, due to wait_counts in InjectionPointSharedState.
So, yes, your change to the test seems correct to me. We can do the test with just one injection point.
Best regards, Andrey Borodin.