I know, but I don't get too many opportunities to contribute... :)
Just figured I'd mention it.
-tfo
On Jul 23, 2004, at 4:06 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> "Thomas F.O'Connell" <tfo@sitening.com> writes:
>> I realize this is a trivial issue, but it seems like logic could be
>> added to the CASE statement to prevent irrelevant SELECT material from
>> being output.
>
> Hardly seems worth the trouble ...
>
> regards, tom lane