On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 3:01 AM, Magnus Hagander <<a href="mailto:magnus@hagander.net">magnus@hagander.net</a>>
wrote:<br/><div class="gmail_quote"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204);
margin:0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;"><div class="Ih2E3d">Gurjeet Singh wrote:<br /> > On Thu, Mar 6, 2008
at5:01 PM, Gevik Babakhani <<a href="mailto:pgdev@xs4all.nl">pgdev@xs4all.nl</a><br /></div><div class="Ih2E3d">>
<mailto:<ahref="mailto:pgdev@xs4all.nl">pgdev@xs4all.nl</a>>> wrote:<br /> ><br /> > > No, it's
stillon the TODO. Gevik has also been looking a bit<br /> > > at it (I think - at least he's indicated that
heis), and he<br /> > > recently got some new parser code to look at to see if we can<br /> > >
useto fix it.<br /> > ><br /> ><br /> > I have the new parser code. Next week I have some time
reservedto<br /> > look at<br /> > it.<br /> ><br /> ><br /> > For the last few days I have been
noticingthat the _ (underscore) is no<br /> > longer being treated as a word boundary. Can you confirm this has
been<br/> > fixed?<br /><br /></div>AFAIK, nothing has been done yet :-)<font color="#888888"><br
/></font></blockquote></div><br/>You are right.... I was looking for pg_standby and another pg_<something> and
sinceI found those results on top, I thought there was some action taken.<br /><br />The problem persists....<br /><br
/>Bestregards,<br />-- <br />gurjeet[.singh]@EnterpriseDB.com<br />singh.gurjeet@{ gmail | hotmail | indiatimes | yahoo
}.com<br/><br />EnterpriseDB <a href="http://www.enterprisedb.com">http://www.enterprisedb.com</a><br /><br />Mail sent
frommy BlackLaptop device