I dont think anyone is arguing that such an application is not
broken. We should see how we can stop a developer from writing buggy
code.
IMO, such a GUC variable _should_ be created and turned on by default.
In case an application fails, at the least, the developer knows
that his application is broken; then he can choose to turn off the GUC
variable to let the old behaviour prevail (he might want to do this to
let a production env. continue).
In the absence of such a feature, we are encouraging developers to
write buggy code. This GUC variable can be removed and the behaviour
can be made default over the next couple of releases.
My two paise...
On 5/10/06, Bernd Helmle <mailings@oopsware.de> wrote:
>
>
> --On Mittwoch, Mai 10, 2006 12:36:07 +0200 Mario Weilguni
> <mweilguni@sime.com> wrote:
>
> >> Such a behavior is already broken by design. I think it's not desirable
> >> to blindly do
> >> transaction start or commit without tracking the current transaction
> >> state. So these wrappers
> >> need to be fixed first.
> >
> > You mean broken like "transform_null_equals"? Or "add_missing_from"?
>
> You missed my point. I don't say that such a GUC won't be useful, but
> applications which
> don't care about what they are currently doing with a database are broken.
>
>
> --
>
> Bernd
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 5: don't forget to increase your free space map settings
>