Re: palloc unification

Simon Riggs <simon@2ndQuadrant.com> writes:
> On 6 February 2013 14:38, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
>> Yeah, I am doing this right now and the "shared" name doesn't seem so
>> good.  "libpgframework" sounds decent.  So since libpgport comes from
>> src/port, are we okay with src/framework and src/include/framework?

> "common" ?

> src/backend/common
> src/include/common

To me the term "framework" carries a lot of baggage that doesn't fit
this usage.  "common" seems better.
        regards, tom lane