Re: Postgres scalability and performance on windows
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Postgres scalability and performance on windows |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 6536.1164731082@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение |
| Ответ на | Re: Postgres scalability and performance on windows ("Gopal" <gopal@getmapping.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Postgres scalability and performance on windows
|
| Список | pgsql-performance |
"Gopal" <gopal@getmapping.com> writes:
> This is the query and the schema....
> ...
> select
> sum(area(intersection(snaptogrid(chunkgeometry,0.00000001),
> GeometryFromText('POLYGON((-0.140030845589332
> 50.8208343077265,-0.138958398039148 50.8478005422809,-0.0963639712296823
> 50.8471133071392,-0.0974609286275892 50.8201477285483,-0.140030845589332
> 50.8208343077265))',4326))) * 100/ (0.00114901195862628)) as
> percentCover,
So evidently area(intersection(snaptogrid(...))) takes about 300
microsec per row. The PostGIS hackers would have to comment on whether
that seems out-of-line or not, and whether you can make it faster.
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: