Re: [HACKERS] GUC for cleanup indexes threshold.

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Pavel Golub
Тема Re: [HACKERS] GUC for cleanup indexes threshold.
Дата
Msg-id 6510094934.20171010125555@gf.microolap.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [HACKERS] GUC for cleanup indexes threshold.  (Darafei Praliaskouski <me@komzpa.net>)
Ответы Re: [HACKERS] GUC for cleanup indexes threshold.  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Hello, Darafei.

You wrote:

DP> The following review has been posted through the commitfest application:
DP> make installcheck-world:  tested, passed
DP> Implements feature:       tested, passed
DP> Spec compliant:           tested, passed
DP> Documentation:            tested, passed

DP> We're using Postgres with this patch for some time.

DP> In our use case we've got a quickly growing large table with events from our users.
DP> Table has a structure of (user_id, ts, <event data>). Events are
DP> append only, each user generates events in small predictable time frame, mostly each second.
DP> From time to time we need to read this table in fashion of WHERE
DP> ts BETWEEN a AND b AND user_id=c.
DP> Such query leads to enormous amount of seeks, as records of each
DP> user are scattered across relation and there are no pages that
DP> contain two events from same user.

DP> To fight it, we created a btree index on (user_id, ts,
DP> <event_data>). Plan switched to index only scans, but heap fetches
DP> and execution times were still the same. 
DP> Manual 
DP> We noticed that autovacuum skips scanning the relation and freezing the Visibility Map.

DP> We started frequently performing VACUUM manually on the relation.
DP> This helped with freezing the Visibility Map.
DP> However, we found out that VACUUM makes a full scan over the index.
DP> As index does not fit into memory, this means that each run
DP> flushes all the disk caches and eats up Amazon IOPS credits. 

DP> With this patch behavior is much better for us - VACUUM finishes real quick.

DP> As a future improvement, a similar improvement for other index types will be useful.
DP> After it happens, I'm looking forward to autovacuum kicking in on
DP> append-only tables, to freeze the Visibility Map.

DP> The new status of this patch is: Ready for Committer


Seems  like,  we  may  also  going to hit it and it would be cool this
vacuum issue solved for next PG version.

-- 
With best wishes,Pavel                          mailto:pavel@gf.microolap.com



-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Rushabh Lathia
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] Parallel tuplesort (for parallel B-Tree index creation)
Следующее
От: Ashutosh Bapat
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] Partition-wise aggregation/grouping