Re: Stampede of the JIT compilers
| От | Michael Banck |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Stampede of the JIT compilers |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 64980469.1c0a0220.9a5e.f18d@mx.google.com обсуждение |
| Ответ на | Re: Stampede of the JIT compilers (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Stampede of the JIT compilers
Re: Stampede of the JIT compilers |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Hi, On Sat, Jun 24, 2023 at 01:54:53PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > I don't know whether raising the default would be enough to fix that > in a nice way, and I certainly don't pretend to have a specific value > to offer. But it's undeniable that we have a serious problem here, > to the point where JIT is a net negative for quite a few people. Some further data: to my knowledge, most major managed postgres providers disable jit for their users. Azure certainly does, but I don't have a Google Cloud SQL or RDS instance running right to verify their settings. I do seem to remember that they did as well though, at least a while back. Michael
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: