Re: Stampede of the JIT compilers

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Michael Banck
Тема Re: Stampede of the JIT compilers
Дата
Msg-id 64980469.1c0a0220.9a5e.f18d@mx.google.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Stampede of the JIT compilers  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Ответы Re: Stampede of the JIT compilers
Re: Stampede of the JIT compilers
Список pgsql-hackers
Hi,

On Sat, Jun 24, 2023 at 01:54:53PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> I don't know whether raising the default would be enough to fix that
> in a nice way, and I certainly don't pretend to have a specific value
> to offer.  But it's undeniable that we have a serious problem here,
> to the point where JIT is a net negative for quite a few people.

Some further data: to my knowledge, most major managed postgres
providers disable jit for their users. Azure certainly does, but I don't
have a Google Cloud SQL or RDS instance running right to verify their
settings. I do seem to remember that they did as well though, at least a
while back.


Michael



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Richard Guo
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Incremental sort for access method with ordered scan support (amcanorderbyop)
Следующее
От: "Joel Jacobson"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Do we want a hashset type?