Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
> .... Anyway I think the tests here are
> massive and the code is not; perhaps people get the mistaken impression
> that this is a huge amount of code which scares them. Perhaps you could
> split it up in (1) code and (2) tests, which wouldn't achieve any
> technical benefit but would offer some psychological comfort to
> potential reviewers. You know it's all psychology in these parts.
Perhaps the tests could be made less bulky. We do not need massive
permanent regression tests for a single feature, IMO.
regards, tom lane