Re: psql questions: SQL, progname, copyright dates
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: psql questions: SQL, progname, copyright dates |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 6403.1094746120@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение |
| Ответ на | Re: psql questions: SQL, progname, copyright dates (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>) |
| Ответы |
Re: psql questions: SQL, progname, copyright dates
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> I talked to Greg via chat and it looks like '&' is the best choice for
> adding system object display:
> \d& shows system stuff
Yech, that's awful. It looks ugly and it commandeers a punctuation
symbol that we might wish to use for something else someday.
I thought the "S" suggestion was much better than this.
Personally I am not unhappy with the existing behavior, because (unlike
Greg I guess) I use \df and \do to look at system definitions all the
time. However I'm willing to accept \dfS on the grounds of symmetry
with the behavior for tables. I don't really want to put up with a less
convenient behavior *and* a gratuitously different syntax.
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: