Re: doc: create table improvements

> On Oct 23, 2025, at 12:43, Laurenz Albe <laurenz.albe@cybertec.at> wrote:
>
> On Mon, 2025-10-20 at 07:41 -0400, David G. Johnston wrote:
>> I question whether “parameter” is even the correct class to assign here
>> and so would rather avoid the issue by not assigning a class.
>
> Right.  I have removed the vestiges from my failed attempt to improve
> the "parameter" decorations.
>
>> “If none is specified, the data will be persistent” would be better
>> written “If unspecified the data will be persistent” (or, “if not specified…”)
>
> I decided to use the trusted phrasing "by default".
>
>> Everything else looks good.
>
> Patch attached; if it is fine with you, I'll mark it "ready for committer".
>
> Yours,
> Laurenz Albe
> <v4-0001-Unclutter-CREATE-TABLE-synopsis.patch>

Overall the change looks good to me. I have only one comment about the naming of “oversize_storage”. Why not just
“storage_parameters”or similar that sounds more straightforward? 

Best regards,
--
Chao Li (Evan)
HighGo Software Co., Ltd.
https://www.highgo.com/