Re: shared_buffers vs. -B flag: 7.4

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: shared_buffers vs. -B flag: 7.4
Дата
Msg-id 6399.1106513196@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: shared_buffers vs. -B flag: 7.4  (elein@varlena.com (elein))
Список pgsql-bugs
elein@varlena.com (elein) writes:
> Hmmm. This was reproduced at a customer site by
> a very meticulous dba.  I'll check back with him.

It would be worth enquiring exactly what values he was testing.
IIRC, 7.4 doesn't have any defense against setting NBuffers so large
as to make the shmem segment size calculation overflow.
This would of course lead to crashes at runtime, but I think the
postmaster startup would complete ...

            regards, tom lane

В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: elein@varlena.com (elein)
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: shared_buffers vs. -B flag: 7.4
Следующее
От: "Hendrik Mueller"
Дата:
Сообщение: BUG #1428: SHGetSpecialFolderPath not found in SHELL32.dll