Re: clearing opfuncid vs. parallel query

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: clearing opfuncid vs. parallel query
Дата
Msg-id 6397.1443112549@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: clearing opfuncid vs. parallel query  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: clearing opfuncid vs. parallel query  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
> Also, it's not like this change couldn't be UN-done at a future point.
> I mean, Tom didn't like the flag I added aesthetically, but if we
> needed it, we could have it.  Or we could engineer something else.

For the record: that's true for the patch you just committed.  But once
I remove the hopefully-now-dead planner support for recomputing opfuncid,
it would get a lot more painful to reverse the decision.
        regards, tom lane



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: clearing opfuncid vs. parallel query
Следующее
От: Tomas Vondra
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: DBT-3 with SF=20 got failed