Re: pg_dumpall + restore = missing view
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: pg_dumpall + restore = missing view |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 639.1100913874@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение |
| Ответ на | pg_dumpall + restore = missing view (Steve Crawford <scrawford@pinpointresearch.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: pg_dumpall + restore = missing view
|
| Список | pgsql-general |
Steve Crawford <scrawford@pinpointresearch.com> writes:
> This appears to have all gone well execpt that one view is missing.
> I've restored that view by hand but am curious if this is a PG bug or
> failure of the nut behind the wheel.
> The view involves the union of many tables and its creation failed
> because creation of one of the tables does not take place until later
> in the dump file.
This is a longstanding pg_dump bug: it's not very bright about order of
creation of objects. (In this case I surmise that you created the view,
and later altered it to reference a table that didn't exist when the
view was originally created.)
As of 8.0 pg_dump examines dependency information and should theoretically
always get this right, but in prior versions it's a real hazard.
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: