"Zeugswetter Andreas SB SD" <ZeugswetterA@spardat.at> writes:
>> "Zeugswetter Andreas SB SD" <ZeugswetterA@spardat.at> writes:
>>> Hard to say what is good for those names imho, don't like
>>> "anytype" :-(
>>
>> How about "any"? It's a reserved word per SQL99, I think.
> I would actually stick to opaque in that case, already used in other db's.
I want to change the name because (a) we are changing the semantics,
(b) we can't throw notices for opaque if we keep it as a valid choice.
>>> Maybe "anyarray" instead of "anyarraytype".
>>
>> That would match with "any".
> I thought you wanted it separate ?
I meant that if the one name is "any", then making the other "anyarray"
(ie, both without "type" on the end) is consistent.
regards, tom lane