Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie> writes:
> On Wed, Jan 17, 2018 at 12:31 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> +1. If the problem isn't known to be reproducible in those branches,
>> the risk of adding new bugs seems to outweigh any benefit.
> You could make the same objection to changing tuplesort_getdatum()
> outside of the master branch, though. I think that going back further
> than that for the (arguably independent) tuplesort_getdatum() subset
> fix might still be a good idea. I wonder where you stand on this.
I haven't been following the thread very closely, so I don't have an
opinion on that.
regards, tom lane