Re: pgindent versus struct members and typedefs

> On May 6, 2026, at 05:47, Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Dec 02, 2025 at 05:51:15PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Chao Li <li.evan.chao@gmail.com> writes:
>>> On Dec 3, 2025, at 06:00, Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> I tried to fix pgindent for a few, but the code is basically impenetrable.
>>>> I didn't find any fixes upstream [0], either.  As noted above, we could
>>>> also fix it by avoiding the naming conflicts.  However, I can't imagine
>>>> that's worth the churn, and I've already spent way too much time on this,
>>>> so IMHO the best thing to do here is nothing.
>>
>>> I think that’s fine.
>>
>> Agreed, not worth the trouble to fool with.
>
> For fun, I spent some time with an AI tool to develop the attached fix for
> this problem.  The explanation seems reasonable to me, although I am by no
> means a pgindent expert.  When I looked at this in December, I did find
> this similar commit from upstream [0], but I failed to make the connection
> with last_u_d.  0002 is the result of a pgindent run after applying 0001.
> You'll notice that it fixes the exact set of cases I found with grep
> upthread.
>
> [0] https://github.com/pstef/freebsd_indent/commit/afa2239
>
> --
> nathan
> <v1-0001-pgindent-Fix-spacing-after-when-member-name-match.patch><v1-0002-run-pgindent.patch>

From 0002, the fix looks good. I tried to run the patched pgindent against all .c and .h files under src/ and contrib/,
theresult is exactly the same as 0002. 

So, maybe worthy pushing before Tom running the annual pgindent.

Best regards,
--
Chao Li (Evan)
HighGo Software Co., Ltd.
https://www.highgo.com/