Re: pg_upgrade < 9.3 -> >=9.3 misses a step around multixacts

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: pg_upgrade < 9.3 -> >=9.3 misses a step around multixacts
Дата
Msg-id 6333.1405962201@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: pg_upgrade < 9.3 -> >=9.3 misses a step around multixacts  (Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com>)
Ответы Re: pg_upgrade < 9.3 -> >=9.3 misses a step around multixacts  (Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com>)
Список pgsql-bugs
Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
> On 2014-07-21 12:43:24 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Will fix.

> I wonder if GetTopTransactionId()/MultiXactIdSetOldestMember() and using
> lastSane* = ReadNew* isn't sufficient. After the xid assignment
> concurrent GetOldest* can't go below the ReadNew* values anymore, right?

I don't see any point in being picky about it.  What we want is to reject
values that are conclusively bogus; things that are just close to bogus
are not so interesting.

            regards, tom lane

В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Andres Freund
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: pg_upgrade < 9.3 -> >=9.3 misses a step around multixacts
Следующее
От: Andres Freund
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: pg_upgrade < 9.3 -> >=9.3 misses a step around multixacts