Re: Vacuum statistics
От | Andrei Lepikhov |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Vacuum statistics |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 631e09ab-099c-4089-883d-4524d852dfa2@gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Vacuum statistics (Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov@gmail.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 10/28/24 14:40, Alexander Korotkov wrote: > On Sun, Aug 25, 2024 at 6:59 PM Alena Rybakina >> If I missed something or misunderstood, can you explain in more detail? > > Actually, I mean why do we need a possibility to return statistics for > all tables/indexes in one function call? User anyway is supposed to > use pg_stat_vacuum_indexes/pg_stat_vacuum_tables view, which do > function calls one per relation. I suppose we can get rid of > possibility to get all the objects in one function call and just > return a tuple from the functions like other pgstatfuncs.c functions > do. I suppose it was designed this way because databases may contain thousands of tables and indexes - remember, at least, partitions. But it may be okay to use the SRF_FIRSTCALL_INIT / SRF_RETURN_NEXT API. I think by registering a prosupport routine predicting cost and rows of these calls, we may let the planner build adequate plans for queries involving those stats - people will definitely join it with something else in the database. -- regards, Andrei Lepikhov
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: