Re: HaveNFreeProcs ?
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: HaveNFreeProcs ? |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 631.1119500318@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение |
| Ответ на | HaveNFreeProcs ? (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@surnet.cl>) |
| Ответы |
Re: HaveNFreeProcs ?
Re: HaveNFreeProcs ? |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@surnet.cl> writes:
> I just noticed the HaveNFreeProcs routine is coded as a loop around the
> ProcGlobal struct members. I wonder if it's possible to use a simple
> check in procArray->numBackends against procArray->maxBackends instead?
It used to look like that, but now that numBackends includes prepared
transactions that's no longer a useful test. I think that the existing
coding is OK, because it's written to not loop more than
superuser_reserved_connections times, and it's hard to imagine anyone
would set that to more than half a dozen or so.
Also, that routine will disappear entirely if we agree to remove
commit_siblings (see nearby thread), so right at the moment I'm not very
concerned about improving it. If it is still there forty-eight hours
from now, let's talk about it then.
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: