Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
> On Wed, Jun 1, 2022 at 11:40 AM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> Looks reasonable to me, but I'm hardly a Perl monk. Anybody have
>> a different opinion?
> Well, it falsifies the immediately preceding comment, but I think it's
> fine otherwise.
Duh, right, will fix.
This seems appropriate to back-patch as far as 9.2, since AFAIK there's
not currently anything that breaks plperl in the out-of-support branches.
regards, tom lane